Compared To Jeep Gladiator 2020
© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. YCM12-KK7LV 162.241.241.35 2020/09/20The Ranger stops shorter than the Gladiator:
| |
Ranger |
Gladiator |
|
| 60 to 0 MPH |
127 feet |
133 feet |
Motor Trend |
Compared To Jeep Wrangler 2020
© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. YCM12-KK7LV 162.241.241.35 2020/09/20The Ranger’s standard front and rear disc brakes are vented to help dissipate heat for shorter stops with less fading. The rear discs on the Wrangler are solid, not vented.
The Ranger stops much shorter than the Wrangler:
| |
Ranger |
Wrangler |
|
| 70 to 0 MPH |
190 feet |
194 feet |
Car and Driver |
| 60 to 0 MPH |
127 feet |
150 feet |
Motor Trend |
| 60 to 0 MPH (Wet) |
150 feet |
163 feet |
Consumer Reports |
Compared To GMC Canyon 2020
© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. YCM12-KK7LV 162.241.241.35 2020/09/20The Ranger’s standard front and rear disc brakes are vented to help dissipate heat for shorter stops with less fading. The rear discs on the Canyon are solid, not vented.
Compared To Nissan Frontier 2019
© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. YCM12-KK7LV 162.241.241.35 2020/09/20For better stopping power the Ranger’s brake rotors are larger than those on the Frontier:
| |
Ranger |
Frontier 4 cyl. |
Frontier V6 |
| Front Rotors |
12.2 inches |
11.1 inches |
11.7 inches |
| Rear Rotors |
12.1 inches |
11.3 inches |
11.3 inches |
The Ranger stops shorter than the Frontier:
| |
Ranger |
Frontier |
|
| 70 to 0 MPH |
190 feet |
199 feet |
Car and Driver |
| 60 to 0 MPH |
127 feet |
131 feet |
Motor Trend |
| 60 to 0 MPH (Wet) |
150 feet |
156 feet |
Consumer Reports |
Compared To Honda Ridgeline 2020
© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. YCM12-KK7LV 162.241.241.35 2020/09/20The Ranger’s standard front and rear disc brakes are vented to help dissipate heat for shorter stops with less fading. The rear discs on the Ridgeline are solid, not vented.
The Ranger stops shorter than the Ridgeline:
| |
Ranger |
Ridgeline |
|
| 70 to 0 MPH |
190 feet |
195 feet |
Car and Driver |
| 60 to 0 MPH |
122 feet |
129 feet |
Motor Trend |
Compared To Nissan Frontier 2020
© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. YCM12-KK7LV 162.241.241.35 2020/09/20For better stopping power the Ranger’s brake rotors are larger than those on the Frontier:
| |
Ranger |
Frontier King Cab |
Frontier Crew Cab |
| Front Rotors |
12.2 inches |
11.1 inches |
11.7 inches |
| Rear Rotors |
12.1 inches |
11.3 inches |
11.3 inches |
The Ranger stops shorter than the Frontier:
| |
Ranger |
Frontier |
|
| 70 to 0 MPH |
190 feet |
199 feet |
Car and Driver |
| 60 to 0 MPH |
122 feet |
131 feet |
Motor Trend |
| 60 to 0 MPH (Wet) |
150 feet |
156 feet |
Consumer Reports |
Compared To Chevrolet Colorado 2020
© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. YCM12-KK7LV 162.241.241.35 2020/09/20The Ranger’s standard front and rear disc brakes are vented to help dissipate heat for shorter stops with less fading. The rear discs on the Colorado are solid, not vented.
The Ranger stops much shorter than the Colorado:
| |
Ranger |
Colorado |
|
| 70 to 0 MPH |
190 feet |
206 feet |
Car and Driver |
| 60 to 0 MPH |
127 feet |
135 feet |
Motor Trend |
Compared To Honda Ridgeline 2019
© 1999 - 2020 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. YCM12-KK7LV 162.241.241.35 2020/09/20The Ranger’s standard front and rear disc brakes are vented to help dissipate heat for shorter stops with less fading. The rear discs on the Ridgeline are solid, not vented.
The Ranger stops shorter than the Ridgeline:
| |
Ranger |
Ridgeline |
|
| 70 to 0 MPH |
190 feet |
195 feet |
Car and Driver |
| 60 to 0 MPH |
127 feet |
129 feet |
Motor Trend |
