See how a 2021 Ford Ranger sizes up to its competition in Brakes And Stopping Near Chatsworth, GA.


 
  • North Georgia Ford Journal
  • Jul 4th 2021 - 110 days ago
  • Chatsworth, GA
  • Share This Story

Compared To Jeep Gladiator 2021



© 1999 - 2021 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. YCM12-KK7LV 162.241.241.35 2021/07/04

The Ranger stops much shorter than the Gladiator:

Ranger

Gladiator

60 to 0 MPH

122 feet

133 feet

Motor Trend




Compared To Jeep Wrangler 2021



© 1999 - 2021 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. YCM12-KK7LV 162.241.241.35 2021/07/04

The Ranger’s standard front and rear disc brakes are vented to help dissipate heat for shorter stops with less fading. The rear discs standard on the Wrangler 4x4 Sport are solid, not vented.

The Ranger stops much shorter than the Wrangler:

Ranger

Wrangler

70 to 0 MPH

190 feet

198 feet

Car and Driver

60 to 0 MPH

122 feet

150 feet

Motor Trend

60 to 0 MPH (Wet)

150 feet

163 feet

Consumer Reports




Compared To Toyota Tacoma 2021



© 1999 - 2021 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. YCM12-KK7LV 162.241.241.35 2021/07/04

For better stopping power the Ranger’s standard brake rotors are larger than those on the Tacoma:

Ranger

Tacoma

Front Rotors

12.2 inches

10.75 inches

Rear Rotors

12.1 inches

10” drums

The Ford Ranger has standard four-wheel disc brakes for better stopping power and improved directional control in poor weather. Only rear drums come on the Tacoma. Drums can heat up and make stops longer, especially with antilock brakes that work much harder than conventional brakes.

The Ranger stops much shorter than the Tacoma:

Ranger

Tacoma

70 to 0 MPH

190 feet

195 feet

Car and Driver

60 to 0 MPH

122 feet

133 feet

Motor Trend

60 to 0 MPH (Wet)

150 feet

158 feet

Consumer Reports




Compared To Honda Ridgeline 2020



© 1999 - 2021 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. YCM12-KK7LV 162.241.241.35 2021/07/04

The Ranger’s standard front and rear disc brakes are vented to help dissipate heat for shorter stops with less fading. The rear discs on the Ridgeline are solid, not vented.

The Ranger stops shorter than the Ridgeline:

Ranger

Ridgeline

70 to 0 MPH

190 feet

195 feet

Car and Driver

60 to 0 MPH

122 feet

129 feet

Motor Trend




Compared To Chevrolet Colorado 2021



© 1999 - 2021 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. YCM12-KK7LV 162.241.241.35 2021/07/04

The Ranger’s standard front and rear disc brakes are vented to help dissipate heat for shorter stops with less fading. The rear discs on the Colorado are solid, not vented.

The Ranger stops much shorter than the Colorado:

Ranger

Colorado

70 to 0 MPH

190 feet

206 feet

Car and Driver

60 to 0 MPH

122 feet

135 feet

Motor Trend




Compared To GMC Canyon 2021



© 1999 - 2021 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. YCM12-KK7LV 162.241.241.35 2021/07/04

The Ranger’s standard front and rear disc brakes are vented to help dissipate heat for shorter stops with less fading. The rear discs on the Canyon are solid, not vented.

The Ranger stops shorter than the Canyon:

Ranger

Canyon

60 to 0 MPH

122 feet

125 feet

Motor Trend




Compared To Honda Ridgeline 2021



© 1999 - 2021 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. YCM12-KK7LV 162.241.241.35 2021/07/04

The Ranger’s standard front and rear disc brakes are vented to help dissipate heat for shorter stops with less fading. The rear discs on the Ridgeline are solid, not vented.

The Ranger stops shorter than the Ridgeline:

Ranger

Ridgeline

70 to 0 MPH

190 feet

195 feet

Car and Driver

60 to 0 MPH

122 feet

129 feet

Motor Trend




Compared To Nissan Frontier 2020



© 1999 - 2021 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. YCM12-KK7LV 162.241.241.35 2021/07/04

For better stopping power the Ranger’s brake rotors are larger than those on the Frontier:

Ranger

Frontier King Cab

Frontier Crew Cab

Front Rotors

12.2 inches

11.1 inches

11.7 inches

Rear Rotors

12.1 inches

11.3 inches

11.3 inches

The Ranger stops shorter than the Frontier:

Ranger

Frontier

70 to 0 MPH

190 feet

199 feet

Car and Driver

60 to 0 MPH

122 feet

131 feet

Motor Trend

60 to 0 MPH (Wet)

150 feet

156 feet

Consumer Reports