North Georgia Ford Compares 2019 Ford Mustang VS 2019 Lexus RC Near Chatsworth, GA

Responsive image

2019 Ford Mustang

Responsive image
VS

2019 Lexus RC

Safety Comparison

Both the Mustang and the RC have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, driver and front passenger knee airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, daytime running lights, rearview cameras, available crash mitigating brakes, lane departure warning systems, blind spot warning systems, rear parking sensors, rear cross-path warning and driver alert monitors.

Warranty Comparison

There are almost 13 times as many Ford dealers as there are Lexus dealers, which makes it much easier should you ever need service under the Mustang’s warranty.

Reliability Comparison

A hardened steel chain, with no maintenance needs, drives the camshafts in the Mustang’s engine. A rubber cam drive belt that needs periodic replacement drives the RC’s camshafts. If the RC’s belt breaks, the engine could be severely damaged when the pistons hit the opened valves.

The Mustang has a standard “limp home system” to keep drivers from being stranded if most or all of the engine’s coolant is lost. The engine will run on only half of its cylinders at a time, reduce its power and light a warning lamp on the dashboard so the driver can get to a service station for repairs. The RC doesn’t offer a lost coolant limp home mode, so a coolant leak could strand you or seriously damage the car’s engine.

J.D. Power and Associates rated the Mustang first among midsize sporty cars in their 2018 Initial Quality Study. The RC isn’t in the top three in its category.

J.D. Power and Associates’ 2018 Initial Quality Study of new car owners surveyed provide the statistics that show that Ford vehicles are better in initial quality than Lexus vehicles. J.D. Power ranks Ford fifth in initial quality, above the industry average. With 3 more problems per 100 vehicles, Lexus is ranked 8th.

Engine Comparison

The Mustang has more powerful engines than the RC:

 

Horsepower

Torque

Mustang 2.3 turbo 4 cyl.

310 HP

350 lbs.-ft.

Mustang GT 5.0 DOHC V8

460 HP

420 lbs.-ft.

Mustang BULLITT 5.0 DOHC V8

480 HP

420 lbs.-ft.

RC 300 2.0 turbo 4 cyl.

241 HP

258 lbs.-ft.

RC 300 AWD 3.5 DOHC V6

260 HP

236 lbs.-ft.

RC 350 3.5 DOHC V6

311 HP

280 lbs.-ft.

Fuel Economy and Range Comparison

On the EPA test cycle the Mustang Fastback Auto turbo 4 cyl. gets better highway fuel mileage than the RC 300 RWD (21 city/32 hwy vs. 21 city/30 hwy).

To lower fuel costs and make buying fuel easier, the Ford Mustang uses regular unleaded gasoline (premium recommended for maximum performance). The RC requires premium, which can cost 20 to 55 cents more per gallon.

The Mustang has a standard cap-less fueling system. The fuel filler is automatically opened when the fuel nozzle is inserted and automatically closed when it’s removed. This eliminates the need to unscrew and replace the cap and it reduces fuel evaporation, which causes pollution. The RC doesn’t offer a cap-less fueling system.

Brakes and Stopping Comparison

For better stopping power the Mustang GT’s brake rotors are larger than those on the RC:

 

Mustang GT

RC

RC F Sport

Front Rotors

15 inches

13.2 inches

14 inches

Rear Rotors

13 inches

12.2 inches

12.2 inches

The Mustang stops much shorter than the RC:

 

Mustang

RC

 

70 to 0 MPH

164 feet

178 feet

Car and Driver

Tires and Wheels Comparison

For better traction, the Mustang GT’s optional tires are larger than the largest tires available on the RC (305/30R19 vs. 235/40R19).

The Mustang GT’s optional tires provide better handling because they have a lower 30 series profile (height to width ratio) that provides a stiffer sidewall than the RC’s optional 40 series front and 35 series rear tires.

For better ride, handling and brake cooling the Mustang Premium offers optional 20-inch wheels. The RC’s largest wheels are only 19-inches.

Suspension and Handling Comparison

For better handling and stability, the track (width between the wheels) on the Mustang is .2 inches wider in the front and 2.7 inches wider in the rear than the average track on the RC.

The Mustang BULLITT handles at .97 G’s, while the RC 350 pulls only .85 G’s of cornering force in a Car and Driver skidpad test.

Chassis Comparison

The front grille of the Mustang (except Performance Pack) uses electronically controlled shutters to close off airflow and reduce drag when less engine cooling is needed. This helps improve highway fuel economy. The RC doesn’t offer active grille shutters.

The Mustang uses computer-generated active noise cancellation to help remove annoying noise and vibration from the passenger compartment, especially at low frequencies. The RC doesn’t offer active noise cancellation.

Passenger Space Comparison

The Mustang Fastback has 1 inch more front hip room, 1.6 inches more front shoulder room, 1.7 inches more rear legroom, 2.5 inches more rear hip room and 1.4 inches more rear shoulder room than the RC.

Cargo Capacity Comparison

The Mustang Fastback has a much larger trunk than the RC (13.5 vs. 10.4 cubic feet).

Ergonomics Comparison

The Mustang’s standard speed-sensitive wipers speed up when the vehicle does, so that the driver doesn’t have to continually adjust the speed of the wipers. The RC’s standard manually variable intermittent wipers have to be constantly adjusted.

Economic Advantages Comparison

Insurance will cost less for the Mustang owner. The Car Book by Jack Gillis rates the Mustang with a number “3” insurance rate while the RC is rated higher at a number “10” rate.

According to The Car Book by Jack Gillis, the Mustang is less expensive to operate than the RC because it costs $198 less to do the manufacturer’s suggested maintenance for 50,000 miles. Typical repairs cost much less on the Mustang than the RC, including $377 less for a water pump, $597 less for a starter, $364 less for fuel injection, $275 less for a fuel pump, $131 less for front struts, $525 less for a timing belt/chain and $244 less for a power steering pump.

Recommendations Comparison

J.D. Power and Associates rated the Mustang third among midsize sporty cars in owner reported satisfaction. This includes how well the vehicle performs and satisfies its owner’s expectations. The RC isn’t in the top three in its category.

The Mustang GT/Bullitt was chosen as one of Car and Driver’s “Top Ten” in 2019. The RC has never been a Car and Driver “Top Ten” pick.

The Ford Mustang outsold the Lexus RC by almost 23 to one during 2018.

© 1991-2016 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. Who We Are
Click here to view the disclaimers, limitations and notices about EPA fuel mileage, crash tests, coprights, trademarks, and other issues.