Both the EcoSport and the CR-V have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, side-impact head airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, front-wheel drive, height adjustable front shoulder belts, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, daytime running lights, rearview cameras, available blind spot warning systems, rear parking sensors and rear cross-path warning.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a flat barrier at 38.5 MPH and into a post at 20 MPH, results indicate that the Ford EcoSport is safer than the Honda CR-V:
|
EcoSport |
CR-V |
|
Front Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
71 |
137 |
Abdominal Force |
95 G’s |
130 G’s |
Hip Force |
337 lbs. |
354 lbs. |
|
Rear Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
Spine Acceleration |
40 G’s |
53 G’s |
|
Into Pole |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
Max Damage Depth |
12 inches |
13 inches |
HIC |
215 |
390 |
Spine Acceleration |
37 G’s |
43 G’s |
Hip Force |
549 lbs. |
743 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
There are almost 3 times as many Ford dealers as there are Honda dealers, which makes it much easier should you ever need service under the EcoSport’s warranty.
J.D. Power and Associates’ 2019 Initial Quality Study of new car owners surveyed provide the statistics that show that Ford vehicles are better in initial quality than Honda vehicles. J.D. Power ranks Ford fourth in initial quality, above the industry average. With 15 more problems per 100 vehicles, Honda is ranked 16th, below the industry average.
For better stopping power the EcoSport’s brake rotors are larger than those on the CR-V:
|
EcoSport |
CR-V |
Front Rotors |
11.8 inches |
11.1 inches |
Rear Rotors |
10.7 inches |
10.2 inches |
The EcoSport stops shorter than the CR-V:
|
EcoSport |
CR-V |
|
60 to 0 MPH |
132 feet |
137 feet |
Consumer Reports |
60 to 0 MPH (Wet) |
139 feet |
146 feet |
Consumer Reports |
The EcoSport’s standard tires provide better handling because they have a lower 60 series profile (height to width ratio) that provides a stiffer sidewall than the CR-V LX’s standard 65 series tires. The EcoSport SES/Titanium’s tires have a lower 50 series profile than the CR-V EX/EX-L/Touring’s 60 series tires.
The EcoSport has standard front and rear gas-charged shocks for better control over choppy roads. The CR-V’s suspension doesn’t offer gas-charged shocks.
For better maneuverability, the EcoSport’s turning circle is 2.3 feet tighter than the CR-V’s (35.1 feet vs. 37.4 feet).
The Ford EcoSport may be more efficient, handle and accelerate better because it weighs about 250 to 300 pounds less than the Honda CR-V.
The EcoSport is 1 foot, 8.8 inches shorter than the CR-V, making the EcoSport easier to handle, maneuver and park in tight spaces.
The EcoSport has 1.6 inches more front legroom and 1.4 inches more rear hip room than the CR-V.
The power windows standard on both the EcoSport and the CR-V have locks to prevent small children from operating them. When the lock on the EcoSport is engaged the driver can still operate all of the windows, for instance to close one opened by a child. The CR-V prevents the driver from operating the other windows just as it does the other passengers.
In case you lock your keys in your vehicle, or don’t have them with you, you can let yourself in using the EcoSport’s available exterior PIN entry system. The CR-V doesn’t offer an exterior PIN entry system.
In case you lock your keys in your vehicle, or don’t have them with you, you can let yourself in using the EcoSport’s available exterior PIN entry system. The CR-V doesn’t offer an exterior PIN entry system.
The EcoSport’s standard speed-sensitive wipers speed up when the vehicle does, so that the driver doesn’t have to continually adjust the speed of the wipers. The CR-V LX’s standard fixed intermittent wipers only have one fixed delay setting, so the driver will have to manually switch them between slow and intermittent.
The EcoSport (except S) offers an optional 115-volt a/c outlet on the center console, allowing you to recharge a laptop or run small household appliances without special adapters that can break or get misplaced. The CR-V doesn’t offer a house-current electrical outlet.
Insurance will cost less for the EcoSport owner. The Car Book by Jack Gillis rates the EcoSport with a number “8” insurance rate while the CR-V is rated higher at a number “10” rate.
According to The Car Book by Jack Gillis, the EcoSport is less expensive to operate than the CR-V because typical repairs cost much less on the EcoSport than the CR-V, including $57 less for a water pump, $285 less for a starter, $137 less for fuel injection and $44 less for a fuel pump.
© 1991-2016 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved.
Who We Are
Click here
to view the disclaimers, limitations and notices about EPA fuel mileage, crash tests, coprights, trademarks, and other issues.